So, here's how we do it. Follow the links for detailed computations.
Regular season performance in previous season. |
|
Post-season performance in previous season. |
Factored into these base values is a function of the following modifiers:
Standing in total conference record in the three previous seasons. |
|
Second-half improvement, previous regular season. |
|
Returning % of Leading Forwards points. |
|
Returning % of Leading Defensemen points. |
|
Returning % of Leading Goaltenders wins. |
Pred is derived by adding all the base values and modifiers together:
FPred, the basis for our final predictor, is derived by regressing Pred 25% back towards their conference standing of the previous ten seasons:Pred = (RS + PS) + (Prv3 + 1/2 + RetF + RetD + RetG)
FPred = 3 * Pred + Prv10
Sum of all base values and modifiers. |
|
Standing in total conference record in the ten previous seasons. |
|
Final predictor and basis for the TBRW? Prediction. |
Our final prediction, TBRW, is the rank order of FPred.
Predicted ranking. |
The modifiers are computed for the present year, below.
RS is a reversal (returning the largest number for first place) of the regular season Standing of 2002-03. RS = (12 - Standing).
|
Standing | RS |
Brown |
5 | 7 |
Clarkson | 7 | 5 |
Colgate | 8 | 4 |
Cornell | 1 | 11 |
Dartmouth | 3 | 9 |
Harvard | 2 | 10 |
Princeton | 12 | 0 |
RPI | 11 | 1 |
St. Lawrence | 9 | 3 |
Union | 6 | 6 |
Vermont | 10 | 2 |
Yale | 4 | 8 |
The number of post-season upset series wins (+1) and losses (-1) in the 2002-03 playoffs. The consolation game is not counted.
2002-03 upsets:
|
PS |
Brown |
+1 |
Clarkson | -1 |
Colgate | 0 |
Cornell | 0 |
Dartmouth | 0 |
Harvard | 0 |
Princeton | 0 |
RPI | +1 |
St. Lawrence | 0 |
Union | -1 |
Vermont | +1 |
Yale | -1 |
The third (+1 top 33%, 0 middle 33%, -1 bottom 33%) in conference winning percentage (Pct) for the past three seasons (2000-01 through 2002-03): the seasons in which the current returning classes have played.
|
Pct | Rank | Prv3 |
Brown |
.409 | 10 | -1 |
Clarkson | .606 | 3 | +1 |
Colgate | .455 | 7 | 0 |
Cornell | .758 | 1 | +1 |
Dartmouth | .553 | 4 | +1 |
Harvard | .636 | 2 | +1 |
Princeton | .379 | 11 | -1 |
RPI | .439 | 9 | -1 |
St. Lawrence | .500 | 6 | 0 |
Union | .447 | 8 | 0 |
Vermont | .311 | 12 | -1 |
Yale | .508 | 5 | 0 |
The third (+1 top 33%, 0 middle 33%, -1 bottom 33%) in improvement in points gained in the second half of the RS (games 12-22) over the first half (games 1-11), last season (2002-03).
|
Pts Total | Pts 12-22 | Pts 1-11 | Pts Diff | 1/2 |
Brown |
24 | 13 | 11 | +2 | +1 |
Clarkson | 21 | 8 | 13 | -5 | -1 |
Colgate | 21 | 14 | 7 | +7 | +1 |
Cornell | 39 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 0 |
Dartmouth | 26 | 14 | 12 | +2 | +1 |
Harvard | 35 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 0 |
Princeton | 6 | 2 | 4 | -2 | -1 |
RPI | 11 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 0 |
St. Lawrence | 17 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 0 |
Union | 22 | 12 | 10 | +2 | +1 |
Vermont | 16 | 6 | 10 | -4 | -1 |
Yale | 26 | 12 | 14 | -2 | -1 |
The third (+1 top 33%, 0 middle 33%, -1 bottom 33%) in returning % of Leading Forwards points. Team-by-team breakdown here.
|
RetF% | RetF |
Brown |
100 | +1 |
Clarkson | 74 | 0 |
Colgate | 57 | -1 |
Cornell | 62 | -1 |
Dartmouth | 77 | +1 |
Harvard | 64 | -1 |
Princeton | 88 | +1 |
RPI | 74 | 0 |
St. Lawrence | 72 | 0 |
Union | 68 | 0 |
Vermont | 81 | +1 |
Yale | 57 | -1 |
The third (+1 top 33%, 0 middle 33%, -1 bottom 33%) in returning % of Leading Defensemen points. Team-by-team breakdown here.
|
RetD% | RetD |
Brown |
90 | +1 |
Clarkson | 15 | -1 |
Colgate | 92 | +1 |
Cornell | 33 | -1 |
Dartmouth | 31 | -1 |
Harvard | 100 | +1 |
Princeton | 77 | 0 |
RPI | 74 | 0 |
St. Lawrence | 100 | +1 |
Union | 52 | -1 |
Vermont | 64 | 0 |
Yale | 72 | 0 |
The third (+1 top 33%, 0 middle 33%, -1 bottom 33%) in returning % of Leading Goaltenders wins. Team-by-team breakdown here.
|
RetG% | RetG |
Brown |
100 | +0.5 |
Clarkson | 50 | - 1.0 |
Colgate | 100 | +0.5 |
Cornell | 7 | - 1.0 |
Dartmouth | 15 | - 1.0 |
Harvard | 100 | +0.5 |
Princeton | 100 | +0.5 |
RPI | 100 | +0.5 |
St. Lawrence | 100 | +0.5 |
Union | 100 | +0.5 |
Vermont | 15 | - 1.0 |
Yale | 100 | +0.5 |
Pred = (RS + PS) + (Prv3 + 1/2 + RetF + RetD + RetG)
|
RS | PS | Prv3 | 1/2 | RetF | RetD | RetG | Pred |
Brown |
7 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +0.5 | 10.5 |
Clarkson | 5 | -1 | +1 | -1 | 0 | -1 | - 1.0 | 2.0 |
Colgate | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +0.5 | 5.5 |
Cornell | 11 | 0 | +1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | - 1.0 | 9.0 |
Dartmouth | 9 | 0 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | - 1.0 | 10.0 |
Harvard | 10 | 0 | +1 | 0 | -1 | +1 | +0.5 | 11.5 |
Princeton | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | +1 | 0 | +0.5 | - 0.5 |
RPI | 1 | +1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +0.5 | 1.5 |
St. Lawrence | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | +0.5 | 4.5 |
Union | 6 | -1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | -1 | +0.5 | 5.5 |
Vermont | 2 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | 0 | - 1.0 | 1.0 |
Yale | 8 | -1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | +0.5 | 5.5 |
Prv10 is a reversal (returning the largest number for first place) of the regular season Standing of the previous ten seasons, 1993-94 through 2002-03. Prv10 = (12 - Standing).
|
Pct | Standing | Prv10 |
Brown |
.420 | 10 | 2.0 |
Clarkson | .688 | 1 | 11.0 |
Colgate | .544 | 4 | 8.0 |
Cornell | .601 | 2 | 10.0 |
Dartmouth | .397 | 11 | 1.0 |
Harvard | .555 | 3 | 9.0 |
Princeton | .441 | 8(t) | 3.5 |
RPI | .523 | 6 | 6.0 |
St. Lawrence | .537 | 5 | 7.0 |
Union | .370 | 12 | 0.0 |
Vermont | .485 | 7 | 5.0 |
Yale | .441 | 8(t) | 3.5 |
The standings prediction, TBRW, is the rank order of FPred.
|
Pred | 3*Pred | Prv10 | FPred | TBRW |
Brown |
10.5 | 31.5 | 2.0 | 33.5 | 3 |
Clarkson | 2.0 | 6.0 | 11.0 | 17.0 | 8 |
Colgate | 5.5 | 16.5 | 8.0 | 24.5 | 5 |
Cornell | 9.0 | 27.0 | 10.0 | 37.0 | 2 |
Dartmouth | 10.0 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 31.0 | 4 |
Harvard | 11.5 | 34.5 | 9.0 | 43.5 | 1 |
Princeton | - 0.5 | - 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 12 |
RPI | 1.5 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 10.5 | 10 |
St. Lawrence | 4.5 | 13.5 | 7.0 | 20.5 | 6 |
Union | 5.5 | 16.5 | 0.0 | 16.5 | 9 |
Vermont | 1.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 11 |
Yale | 5.5 | 16.5 | 3.5 | 20.0 | 7 |